I used the installable version to view CDs I got from other hospitals, because the viewers included on the CDs are usually crap (and even slower, because they run from a CD). Not for the pixel data, so you still have to wait, and for the pixel data, the loading performance of Radiant is great.īut if the files are in one folder (often the case), Radiant loses the ability to offer a fast overview of what is contained on the CD and more importantly, to load preferentially the series the user wants to view first. It seems like it has to be in a folder under the Root else it will not read the DICOM files from the CD.įor loading the information about images and the structure of the exam, DICOMDIR makes things faster. I mean it does not read files from the CD. Is if I just want to include the 32bit viewer and not the 64bit and want to place the Viewer files in the ROOT. But that would be Equal or better.ĭifference being that if I read DICOMDIR, I can quickly identify all the Studies/Series and Images that are contained on the CD before even actually loading all the Pixel data into the ViewerĪnd for the Question about being able to load the viewer from the root. I have not compared the speed of actually loading Image Pixel data. Your Viewer takes a lot more time to identify all this information than other Viewer (such as eFilm Lite) that reads this from the DICOMDIR.
So in terms of loading the basic Information such as Series Information and # of images in each series. Slow loading because you load each files in a recursion to rebuild the Series. DICOMDIR is a standard and a requirement now for CD/DVD Distribution.
0 kommentar(er)
